I'll skip the questions I can't reply to...
Noises Off wrote:
That depends on what you want and who you listen to. Millers talk about
the percent of extraction when refering to flour. If a flour is 60%
extraction, that means that 60% of the wheat winds up in the flour bag.
The rest is discarded, sold to other channels, or used as animal fodder.
From what I've read, most whole wheat flours in the USA are about 85%
extraction. The other 15% contains minerals, fiber, and other "good
things". A grain mill, unless you sift the output, will produce 100%
extraction flour. Everything that goes in comes out the other side. If
you have a micronizer mill, the flour will be uniform enough that there
is no point in trying to sift it. A burr mill or stone mill will
produce siftable flour.
There is some debate about the quality of micronized flour for
breadmaking. If you look at the web sites that sell micronizers, such
as the WhisperMill and Nutrimill, all their recipes require the addition
of dough conditioners and vital wheat gluten to get a decent rise out of
the breads. Some members of the Bread Baker's Guild of America have
related stories about a miller who went from using a stone mill to a
micronizer, and the quality of his flour dropped to the point where the
professional bakers refused to use it.
The burr grinders tend to produce a coarser flour, which also has
issues. Basically, the fiber prevents bread from rising well.
Commercial whole wheat is harder to make a nicely risen loaf from than
white flour, while the home ground 100% extraction flour is another
order of magnitude or two more difficult.
What about the improved nutrition? Well, most of it is bound up by
phytic acid, so your body can't utilize the additional nutrients.
Luckily, sourdough and long rises do break down the phytic acid, so if
you use sourdough you can see some of the additional nutrients in your diet.
It is worth mentioning that in the middle ages the aristocrats ate white
bread, the peasants ate wheat bread. The artistocrats lived longer.
Some people say it's because they had access to medical care. Right.
Think about the quality of the physicians in those days.
I have owned a WhisperMill, a NutriMill, and a burr grinder attachment
for my KitchenAid mixer. I prefer the KitchenAid attachment overall. I
use it for cracking grains for flavor and texture accents, and to grind
small amounts of flour. The WhisperMill and NutriMill didn't help me
make the kinds of breads I wanted to make.
No, not unless you spill the flour.
Yes and no. If you use it fresh from the milling machine, its fine. If
you wait a day or two, the flour tends to handle poorly. At that point,
you need to let it age a few weeks.
However, the flour you grind can go rancid if stored too long. I think
its best to use it as soon as its ground, and to not make more than you
can use in a day or two.
I suspect the Kenwood is very similar to the KitchenAid, so check your
manual to find out what the limitations are on using the grinder
attachment. You may be warned not to mill more than a certain amount,
and to let the mixer cool off after that for a certain length of time.
If you find some wheat, or rye, or other grains, please tell us how you
did. As a side comment, perhaps more for American than international
readers, if you can find dried corn, grinding it into corn meal just
before you make cornbread totally redefines what cornbread is and should be.
Немає коментарів:
Дописати коментар